|
This chapter is concerned with the
following points:
1. What
is behaviour and what questions can be asked
when considering any given behaviour?
2. How
behaviour is observed and recorded.
3. The
quantification of behaviour.
4.
Writing up a project on behaviour.
WHAT
IS BEHAVIOUR?
Animal
behaviour is the expression of an effort to adapt
or adjust to different internal and external conditions, i.e.
behaviour can be described as an animal’s response to
a stimulus.
The
actions of animals are directed toward:
1.
keeping themselves alive (i.e. individual survival),
and
2.
reproduction (i.e. species survival).
It is
worth pointing out at this stage that animals do not
act for the ‘good of the species’. This is an archaic view
– in fact, it is more appropriate to think of them as acting
for the good of their genetic material and to think of
genes as being selfish (Dawkins, The Selfish Gene).
Behaviour
has evolved by natural selection and a
knowledge and understanding of it has always been a
practical matter for early trappers, hunters, traditional
shepherds and herdsmen. It is a sequence of movements
with a beginning (appetitive behaviours), a
middle and an end (the consummatory act). The study
of behaviour (ethology) involves not only what an animal
does but also when, how, why and where the
behaviour occurred (Lehner, 1979). Social behaviour
involves the development of relationships in which animals
build up regular patterns with each other and their
environment. This is a dynamic process and leads to
stable relationships. These relationships are important
when we examine domestic and captive animal behaviour
(applied ethology).
Only by
understanding animal behaviour can we
really begin to appreciate whether the way we keep animals
is appropriate. There are a number of ways of considering
behaviour. The father of modern behaviour science
is Niko Tinbergen, who established fundamental
methods of analysing behaviour. Tinbergen’s four questions
can be asked of any behaviour:
1.
Causation (mechanism): How is the behaviour
accomplished?
For
example, cockroaches running away from one of
their most effective predators, toads, use wind-sensitive
hairs on their cerci to predict the point at which the toad
has committed itself to a strike in a certain direction. The
cockroaches then turn and immediately run away once
the strike is initiated.
2.
Function: How does the behaviour contribute to the
animal’s survival and reproductive success?
An animal that behaves most appropriately in a given
situation will be the one most likely to succeed, e.g.
fighting, feeding, breeding. For example, cockroaches
running only when they are certain of an actual threat.
Therefore, they don’t waste energy on unnecessary
effort.
3.
Development (ontogeny): How does the behaviour
develop during the animal’s lifetime)? Some key issues
here would include, for example, does the animal have
to learn the behaviour or does it behave appropriately
without prior experience? Also, how much can an innate
behaviour be modified after birth?
When you think about the relationship between age
and behaviour you might also like to think about a dog
cocking its leg and how this behaviour develops. It is not
present at birth but instead appears as a product of
hormonal activity at puberty. This is a useful reminder,
therefore, that genes and the environment continue to
interact throughout life.
4.
Evolution: How did the behaviour evolve (same as
asking how the horse’s hoof evolved) is asking how did
a certain behaviour develop (e.g. beak-wiping in zebra
finch is thought to exist in ‘embryonic form in the
bow-minus- wipe of the closely related
spice finch and striated finch). A more
puzzling question may be how stereotypic
behaviours evolve in the absence of environments
that elicit them.
HOW
BEHAVIOUR IS OBSERVED AND RECORDED
Before
behaviour is recorded a decision must be made
about what responses are to be observed. This will
depend on what questions must be answered. Some
things to be considered are:
1. Choice of relevant observations.
2.
Careful definition of the behaviour to be observed and
methods of ensuring clarity and so avoiding confusion
among observers.
a. The
behaviour must be described on a strictly
empirical basis: based on observation and experiment.
Alternatively, one can refer to an existing
ethogram (a catalogue of the behavioural repertoire)
for the species in question.
b. The
behaviour must not have an interpretation of
functional or inferred aspect such as sleeping,
yawning, was bored, happy, restless. These words
do not describe the behaviour observed but are
observers’ subjective opinions of what was
observed.
3. Choice
of observation schedule. This is important as
it will affect the type of data collected: observations can
focus on one individual (or one dyad or one litter or
other husbandry unit) for a specified amount of time
(focal animal sampling) or be a record of the behaviour
of each individual or all the behaviours evident in a
whole group of subjects as observed at a single instant
every day, once per week (scan or time sampling).
4. Some
factors to be considered when observing
behaviour include:
a.
spacing arrangements between animals (pigs
tend to huddle together in a group, sheep graze in
flocks and continually monitor each other so a fixed
distance between them is maintained, dams and
their offspring having a relationship that is
undergoing change from birth to weaning
and often beyond);
b. orientation;
c.
posture;
d.
various behavioural rhythms that occur over different
times and seasons;
e.
behaviour is influenced by the age and sex of the
animal and also by its past experience.
The
recording of observations can be done in different
ways:
1. By the
observer using a notebook and pencil. The
position of the observer may influence the animal’s
behaviour (a so-called operator effect) and it should
always be stated whether the observer was in full view
of the animals or hidden from them (e.g. in an established
hide or by using mirrors).
2. Using
video-tape recordings. Despite the initial costs
of setting up a video system, it is currently the most
common technique in long-term studies of animal
behaviour. Topics worth noting when considering the
use of video footage in behavioural studies include
a.
video can be used under normal lighting conditions
but infra-red cameras will be required if a
24-hour record is needed and artificial light would
create behavioural artefacts;
b. good
microphones plumbed into the video
recorder are the most convenient means of linking
vocalisations with behavioural patterns.
3.
Single-event recorders can be an efficient means of
creating data from many animals at the same time with-out
the need for video analysis. For example, infra-red
beam breakage can be recorded for simple behaviours
such as a horse putting its head in a bucket.
THE
QUANTIFICATION OF BEHAVIOUR
Once the
behavioural sequences have been recorded,
by one or several methods, they must be quantified so
the behaviours can be analysed. Quantification is giving
numbers to behaviours and it can be done in several
ways:
1. The
frequency and/or magnitude can be recorded for
behaviours that are unitary or discreet (Calhoun, 1975),
e.g. defecation, urination, stretches, shakes.
2.
Duration of behaviour can be recorded, e.g. for how
long does a pig drink, a chicken dust-bathe, or a fight
last between two goats? To quantify these types of
behaviour in full both the frequency and duration should
be recorded over a specified time period.
3. If the
social relationships in a group of animals is
being studied, it is necessary to record which animal
initiates a behaviour (performer) and
which animal it is directed toward
(recipient). It is also worth noting which
animal terminates the interaction. This is important in
agonistic interactions where the relationship between
two animals involves conflict (fighting, threat, avoidance
or displacement at a service point).
4.
Information can be taken from recording devices and
quantified.
5. Once a
behaviour has been quantified the observations
can be repeated and checked.
In any
behavioural experimental set-up, details of the
experiment must be carefully recorded so the experiment can
be repeated by other observers.
In the
past many behavioural studies included no
quantitative data at all and were often anecdotal. This
does not mean they were of no value. In fact they stimulated
the interest and enthusiasm that has led to the
truly scientific studies of animal behaviour.
WRITING UP A PROJECT ON BEHAVIOUR
(ETHOLOGICAL RESEARCH)
This
involves the following sections:
1.
Introduction
2.
Materials and methods
3.
Results
4.
Discussion
5.
References (if used)
6.
Abstract or summary
1.
Introduction
a.
States aims and objectives of study,
b. Or
hypotheses under investigation.
c.
Literature review is not necessary for a short student
project.
2.
Materials and methods
a.
Species—their numbers, breed (if applicable),
age, sex (and whether or not they were desexed).
b.
Environmental context—temperature, humidity,
wind, etc. For field observations a scale map or plan
is useful.
c.
Observational techniques and strategies (a
schedule is a useful inclusion giving time and duration).
3.
Results
a.
Include basic data of what was actually seen.
b.
Results should be clearly and concisely stated
and relevant tables referred to.
c. The
behaviours studied should be defined—a
table is a good way to do this.
4.
Discussion
a. Once
the results have been stated any noteworthy
points should be discussed in order.
b. If
previous studies help throw light on any point
these may be referred to.
c.
Comments on how the current study adds to what
was already known.
d. Any
justifications explaining shortcomings can be
put here.
e. Any
ideas generated from the study.
5.
References (if used)
REFERENCES
Calhoun,
W.N. 1975. Quantification of behaviour. In:
Animal Behaviour in Laboratory and Field. (2nd ed.)
Eds. E.O. Price, A.W. Stokes. W.H. Freeman and Co.,
San Francisco.
Dawkins,
R. 1989. The Selfish Gene, Oxford University
Press. Oxford, UK.
Kisiel,
D.S. 1975. Use of Video-Tape in Analysis of
Behaviour. In: Animal Behaviour in Laboratory and
Field. (2nd ed.) Ed. E.O. Price, A.W. Stokes. W.H.
Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
Lehner,
P.N. 1979. Handbook of Ethological Methods.
Garland STPM Press, N.Y. and London. p. 8-9.
|